If Einstein ever dwelled on the topic of “poverty” he would have said in a matter of fact manner, “it is relative” and had Darwin got time to think on it. He would have said, “It is evolutionary”. Both the great minds could not have been wrong because it is relative as well as evolutionary.
It is relative because it differs from person to person society to society. It is evolutionary because government of India is trying to define a new statistical figure (after 60 years of independence) to qualify someone as being “in poverty”.
In India because of its complex and myriad layers of societal structures it is difficult to define “poverty” and the even greater challenging work is to define “poor”. To understand the complexity let us examine the basic levels of poverty/richness as defined by general population.
- Upper Class (includes super rich class)
- Middle Class
a. Upper-Middle Class
b. Middle-Middle Class
c. Lower-Middle Class
- Lower Class
- Poor
- BPL (below poverty line)
Because of the economic strides India has made, the size of the Middle class (and its three subclasses) has swelled considerably. That is good news because it is an indication that more people are moving from lower levels to higher level of economy. Government is happy about it and not because people are happy but because it got a larger base to get Tax from.
The government’s this happiness is bit soured by the equally uncomfortable fact that the size of the BPL class has swelled with alarming pace. This BPL category expansion is worrying because it is indication of failure of government policies and poverty alleviation departments. The enormous BPL size is a hard factual proof that government has failed miserably.
Now, our government with its magical statistical genius is trying to reduce the BPL size not by doing something meaningful about it but they are doing something cleverer and something more “logical”. They are redefining the threshold of BPL so that a large number of people will no more be considered BPL class! How intelligent with one master stroke the government with its great wisdom has reduced poverty in India.
I am wondering in today’s India how much of being poor is poor enough to be considered BPL.
Can you think of a number? Something that will make you a BPL category (just think hypothetically!).
Our great government is actually close to doing that and the magic number is Rs. 20/-. Yes if your daily income is less than or equal to Rs. 20 you are the lucky/unlucky BPL candidate. If you earn Rs 21/- sorry you lost your access to quality(?) government services run under the “BPL Schemes”.
Just think for a moment on that number. I believe even a roadside beggar earns more than that daily. So to become BPL you have to be even worse than a beggar!
The people at planning commission and other agencies who mull on BPL aspects must be on some high while they proposed that number! How high and ignorant they have become is exemplified by this sort of silly number.
My opinion, a person whose monthly income is below Rs 6,000/- should be considered BPL because of spiraling cost of food, shelter, medicine, education etc in today’s India. And it should be responsibility of the government to build infrastructures and services where these people could have adequate educational and medical services, and easy access to interest free home loans. I know, this will make the BPL class even much bigger in size than the middle class. That will be a negative growth and since government can’t do that they have taken an easy way out, reduce the BPL class size.
If government is really worried about “aam aadmi” (the common people) then instead of coming out with silly number like Rs 20/per day they should rather do something that will address the concerns of BPL class. I would ask them to live a life not on Rs 20/per day but Rs 100/ per day for few months and then come back to their air conditioned rooms and then redefine BPL.
Once I heard a slogan something like this:
“Garibi hatane ke liye hum garibon ko hata denge” (to remove poverty we will remove poor people)
Our current government is hell bent on this principle and implementing it in word and spirit.